this story was taken from www.inq7.net
URL: http://www.inq7.net/opi/2004/jan/27/text/opi_mltan-1-p.htm
The (dangerous) silence
of the lambs
Posted:10:56 PM (Manila Time) | Jan. 26, 2004
By Michael L. Tan
I AM heartened by the way the Inquirer has been giving such prominent coverage to the case of Marivic Isidro Genosa, sentenced to death in 1998 and now ordered released from prison, following a Supreme Court review of her case. I consider the case so important that I will be using it in my classes with medical students and hope something similar can be done with all our law schools as well as institutions training health professionals.
Let’s reconstruct what happened, based on the court records.
Genosa was first found guilty of parricide by a court in Ormoc City in Leyte province. The court said that on Nov. 15, 1995, Genosa “did willfully, unlawfully and feloniously attack, assault, hit and wound one Ben Genosa, her legitimate husband…” The court added that because Genosa had done this “with treachery and evident premeditation,” she deserved the death penalty.
Fortunately, Genosa was able to appeal, with lawyer Katrina Legarda coming in for the defense. With the help of her lawyers and psychologists, Genosa proved she was suffering from the “battered woman syndrome,” with the following signs: (1) the woman believes that the violence inflicted on her is her own fault; (2) the woman is unable to place the responsibility for the violence elsewhere; (3) the woman fears for her life and for her children’s; and (4) the woman believes her abuser is omnipresent and omniscient.
In addition, Dr. Dino Caing testified that Genosa had consulted him at least six times for injuries related to domestic violence and another 23 times for “severe hypertension due to emotional stress.”
Reviewing these new findings, the Supreme Court concluded that Genosa had acted in self-defense, and reduced her sentence from capital punishment to six to 14 years. Because she had already been in prison for more than six years, she was ordered released. The Genosa case has many implications for our courts. Mainly, I was struck by how Genosa had in fact pleaded self-defense when she was first tried, but the court ruled that there was no violence immediately preceding the murder. I wonder how many Genosas have been — and will be — victimized by our judicial system’s lack of understanding of domestic violence.
Coincidentally, the day the Supreme Court ruled on Genosa, the Social Weather Stations (SWS) research group released a survey in which nine percent of the female respondents said they had experienced physical abuse, the majority of whom said this harm was inflicted by their husbands, boyfriends or live-in partners. In the same survey, 12 percent of the male respondents admitted they had physically harmed someone, the majority of whom were their wives, girlfriends and live-in partners.
What our lawyers and judges need to understand is that the degree of violence may vary but because the battering is chronic and becomes more and more frequent, we eventually get the battered woman syndrome, and the long-suffering victims’ outburst may not necessarily be triggered by a violent act.
The syndrome is really similar to what we see in people recruited into cults. Abusive spouses or partners, like cult leaders, hostage their victims’ minds by making them totally dependent, so that even if they are constantly abused, they stay on, sometimes even blaming themselves for the violence. They stay on, too, because their dependency relationships make them believe their abuser is all-powerful, and that there is no escape.
Victims of domestic violence often do not fight back, some even turning to self-destructive behaviors, including suicide. Note that if Genosa had been executed, the message that would gone out to other battered women was that they should just bear with their suffering.
Genosa fought back, and the fact that she shot her husband, and then bludgeoned him with a pipe, tells us it wasn’t just pent-up anger but fear that was involved, almost a determination that she would never again suffer from the abuser. The court only saw the victimized woman’s violence, not the violence inflicted on her by her husband over the years.
Her husband’s death has not meant relief for Genosa. She languished in jail from the time of her arrest in 1995, through her death sentence in 1998, until the Supreme Court ruled in her favor. Even with her release, she still will need help to deal with many old wounds.
The Genosa decision is important because it can now be invoked in other trials, hopefully to help more battered women from being doubly victimized, first by their partners and then by the courts. The Genosa case is particularly instructive because it shows how our judges are willing to even send a battered woman to death row. I’ve written in the past about why capital punishment is so dangerous because it is imposed so capriciously.
Law schools should tackle this landmark case, together with education on gender issues and gender-based violence. I did want to alert the health professions as well to the Genosa case because it so graphically represents what could happen when battered women are unable to get help. Note how Genosa’s doctor had treated her six times for physical injuries. I am sure there were many other times when she did not seek medical help because the injuries, at least the physical ones, were “milder.”
Note, too, that the doctor saw Genosa 23 times for severe hypertension. Our medical, nursing, occupational and physical therapy schools should all be teaching students how to detect signs of domestic violence, especially the less visible emotional and mental injuries. Health professionals are sometimes too quick to dismiss complaints like “back pain,” “high blood” and “nerbyos” [tension] as “psychosomatic” when, in many cases, they are idioms of distress, ways by which battered women are trying to ask for help.
Detection is only the first step. Health professionals need to know where to refer battered spouses. The congressional spouses’ organization has set up halfway houses in each region for survivors of domestic violence but we will need many more of these refuges, as well as counseling centers. The Social Weather Stations figure showing nine percent of women suffering from physical abuse means we may have some 2.1 million people being victimized, many of them bearing the violence like lambs, in dangerous silence.
©2004 www.inq7.net all rights reserved
Yes Bing I have read your articles and papers and they are very informative.
What about the battered man syndrome is that possible?
To invoke the new law on Antiviolence against Women (RA 9262), does the perpetrator have to be a husband, live-in partner or boyfriend?
My friend was badly mauled by her older brother and required one week of hospitalization.
Can my friend sue her brother under this law? If not, under what crime?
Your response will be highly appreciated.
More power, adrian!
Posted by Marie at January 26, 2006, 4:58 pmim a battered wife for almost 8 years, it started 4 years after our marriage, i suffered a lot, physically and emotionally.My self confidence was very low during that time until now. Can you please help me what to do. Thank you and more power
Posted by maria at January 28, 2006, 2:01 amIf you are battered even by your brother or relative , you can sue them under RA 9262.
Please inform your friend Marie.
For Maria, please send me your email address, and write me your story.
Save yourself first from your batterer. then if you have children, save them after, you are safe. You can go to the clerk of court of your nearest Family Court in the City or municipality where you live and they will assist you in filing a complaint under RA9262
and get a protective order so you can be protected from your batterer.
Write me your details and particulars at attysison2020@yahoo.com
i want to be legally separated to my abusive husband, we have 8mos old son…i want to have the full custody but the thing is I dont work in Manila. im a flight attendant…im always out of manila most of the time though im based here in manila.can i get the full custody of my son? please help me…i dont want to lose my son. his threatening me that if i pursue it i will never see our son again. thanks and more power.
Posted by anne at January 31, 2006, 11:55 pm[6] Yes you can file for voluntary legal separation against your husband.
As a general rule a child below 7 years of age is under the care of the mother. Save yourself first , then you can file for a petition for habeas corpus in the court of appeals, to force your spouse to produce your son in case your son is taken away from you and you do not know where he is.
Seek counselling from the DSWD crisis center in Legarda corner San Rafael st.
Give me your email address. Write me at attysison2020@yahoo.com
RA 9262 by its own title, responds to abuses to women and their children, committed by the woman’s partner (whether live-in or legally married, boyfriend or girlfriend if in a lesbian relationship). Please refer to Sec. 3 “Definition of Terms” and Sec. 5 “Acts of VAWC”.
The case of Mauling by a brother, posted by Marie on Jan. 28, 2006, is not within the purview of RA 9262, but under the Revised Penal Code. More often than not, such cases are settled amicably, unlike in RA 9262, where settlement is not applied.
Posted by Mary "Mae" G. Jardiniano at November 7, 2009, 12:38 pmAll comments are moderated. Your comments will not appear here unless approved by the blog owner. Thank you.
for more on battered woman syndrome as a justifying circumstance, please go to http://www.bingguanzon.com and click on "articles and papers"
Bing Guanzon
Posted by bing at January 14, 2006, 10:53 pm